The currency trap, concretely
US capital gain is computed in dollars. Your cost basis is translated at the exchange rate when you acquired the property; your sale proceeds are translated at the rate when you sold. Neither is recalculated for inflation or for currency movement.
So if the shekel strengthened against the dollar over your holding period, the same apartment sold for the same number of shekels produces a dollar gain that exists only because of the exchange rate. It is fully taxable in the United States, and there is no corresponding Israeli tax on it to credit against — because from Israel's point of view nothing happened.
The effect runs both ways: a weakening shekel can produce a dollar loss on a shekel profit. Either way, the number that matters for your US return is not the number on the Israeli closing statement.
Section 121 can apply to a home in Israel
Here is the part that surprises people in the useful direction. The exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence — up to $250,000, or $500,000 for a married couple filing jointly — is not restricted to homes located in the United States.
What it requires is that the property was owned and used as your principal residence for at least two of the five years before the sale, with the usual conditions and limitations. For an American who actually lived in the Israeli apartment, that is a live and potentially very valuable possibility. For one who always rented it out, it is not.
The statute is where this comes from, not an inference from practice. IRC §121(a) excludes gain where "during the 5-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange, such property has been owned and used by the taxpayer as the taxpayer's principal residence for periods aggregating 2 years or more", with the $250,000 and $500,000 caps set by §121(b). Read the section end to end and there is no location test in it — no "in the United States", and nothing equivalent. That is the whole basis for the position, and it is worth stating in exactly that form: the exclusion is not geographically limited by its terms.
Note that periods of rental use and depreciation previously claimed both affect the calculation, so this is not a simple on-off switch. It is, however, worth establishing early rather than discovering afterwards.
Mas shevach and the foreign tax credit
Israeli capital gains tax on the sale is generally creditable in the United States on Form 1116. Two practical frictions:
- Timing. The Israeli tax and the US tax do not necessarily land in the same tax year, and a credit is of limited use in a year with no matching income. Where the years diverge, carryback and carryforward rules become relevant.
- Amount. The Israeli linear-exemption rules can reduce Israeli tax substantially on a long-held property. Less Israeli tax means less credit, and therefore more US tax — the same asymmetry that appears on the rental side.
And a third friction, newer than the other two. The gain also attracts the 3.8% net investment income tax above the income thresholds, and the foreign tax credit cannot be applied against that tax. On 31 August 2026 the Federal Circuit decided Estate of Bruyea v. United States — a US citizen living in Canada who had sold Canadian real estate and tried to credit the Canadian tax against his NIIT — and reversed his win below, holding that "the Convention does not independently provide for a credit that can be taken notwithstanding the Code." The US–Israel treaty opens its credit article with the same "subject to the limitations of the law of the United States" wording the court relied on. Israeli mas shevach can therefore clear the ordinary US tax on the gain and leave the 3.8% behind it.
The depreciation you never claimed is taken from you twice
This is the sharpest edge on the sale, and it is created by a decision made years earlier on the rental side.
The American rule: Publication 527 states that your yearly depreciation deductions "include any depreciation that you were allowed to claim, even if you didn't claim it." The slice of gain attributable to that depreciation is unrecaptured section 1250 gain, and the IRS puts its own rate on it: "The portion of any unrecaptured section 1250 gain from selling section 1250 real property is taxed at a maximum 25% rate."
The Israeli rule has the same shape. On the reduced 10% track, the Tax Authority's guide says that on sale the depreciation that could have been claimed against the reduced-rate income is added to the sale value for mas shevach. On the exemption track, the depreciation that could have been claimed is deducted from the acquisition value instead. Different mechanics, one result: neither track lets you deduct depreciation while you hold the apartment, and both charge you for it when you sell.
Put the two systems side by side and the owner who took Israel's 10% track for simplicity pays Israeli betterment tax on depreciation they were never permitted to deduct, and reduces their US basis by depreciation they may never have deducted either — with up to 25% US tax on that slice. The choice of Israeli track is not only an Israeli decision, and its price is presented years after it was made.
Two things to raise before you sign
A shekel mortgage is its own transaction. Repaying a foreign-currency loan can generate a separate foreign currency gain or loss for US purposes, distinct from the gain on the property, and IRC §988(a)(1)(A) treats it as ordinary income or loss rather than capital gain. There is an exception for individuals, and it is narrower than it looks: §988(e)(3) defines a personal transaction to exclude "any transaction to the extent that expenses properly allocable to such transaction meet the requirements of … section 212" — and mortgage interest on a property held to produce rent is a section 212 expense. On a rental, in other words, the personal exception does not apply. On a home you actually lived in the analysis is different, and we are not going to guess at it here: flag it to your adviser rather than assume it away.
Holding structure changes everything. The analysis above assumes you own the apartment directly, in your own name. Ownership through an Israeli company, a trust or a partnership shifts the sale into an entirely different set of US rules, several of which are punitive if unplanned.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use the $250,000 home sale exclusion on an Israeli apartment?
Potentially yes. The Section 121 exclusion is not limited to property located in the United States. It requires that the home was owned and used as your principal residence for at least two of the five years before the sale, and prior rental use and claimed depreciation both affect the calculation, so the position should be established with an adviser rather than assumed.
Why does the US say I have a gain when I sold at a loss in shekels?
Because US gain is computed in dollars. Your basis is translated at the exchange rate on the purchase date and your proceeds at the rate on the sale date. If the shekel strengthened in between, the dollar figures can show a gain even though the shekel figures show none — and Israel will not have taxed that gain, so there is no credit against it.
Is Israeli mas shevach creditable against US tax?
Israeli capital gains tax on the sale is generally creditable on Form 1116. The practical difficulties are timing, since the Israeli and US tax years may not align and a credit needs matching income to be useful, and amount, since Israeli linear-exemption relief on a long-held property reduces the Israeli tax and therefore the credit available.
Does it matter that the apartment is held through a company?
Considerably. Everything on this page assumes direct ownership in your own name. Holding Israeli property through a company, trust or partnership moves the sale into a different set of US rules, some of which impose significantly worse outcomes when they have not been planned for in advance.
Does mas shevach also cover the 3.8% net investment income tax?
No. The foreign tax credit is allowable only against chapter 1 tax, and the section 1411 net investment income tax sits outside it. On 31 August 2026 the Federal Circuit held in Estate of Bruyea, a case about a US citizen who sold real estate abroad, that a treaty does not independently supply a credit against the NIIT either. Israeli capital gains tax can therefore eliminate the ordinary US tax on the gain and leave the 3.8% standing.
I used Israel’s 10% track and never claimed depreciation. Does that help on the sale?
It generally does not. Publication 527 states that your depreciation deductions include any depreciation you were allowed to claim even if you did not claim it, and that slice is taxed at up to 25% as unrecaptured section 1250 gain. Israel applies the same idea from the other side: on the 10% track the depreciation that could have been claimed is added to the sale value for mas shevach.
Sources
- IRC §121 — exclusion of gain on a principal residence
- IRC §988 — foreign currency transactions
- IRS Topic 409 — capital gains and losses, unrecaptured section 1250 gain
- IRS Publication 527 — depreciation allowed or allowable
- Estate of Bruyea v. United States, No. 2025-1563 (Fed. Cir., 31 August 2026)
- United States–Israel Income Tax Treaty (1975) — Articles 7, 15, 26
- Israel Tax Authority — guide to the residential rental tax tracks (Hebrew)
- Instructions for Form 1116 — foreign tax credit
Related guides
- US Owners of Israeli Property
- FBAR & Form 8938 for an Israeli Bank Account (2026)
- Israeli Rental Income on a US Tax Return (2026)
- Israeli rental income tax for non-residents — the Israeli side of the same income
- Israeli capital gains tax (mas shevach) — the Israeli side of the sale